Thus Toyota settles that is considered by some as the "sudden Acceleration" stronger among hundreds of individual and class action lawsuits. Toyota claims that this terrible incident was caused by a problem with carpet floor. You heard correctly, the floor mat.
It was not a case of the California lemon law; It was a case of wrongful death. No details of the settlement were provided by several news agencies that we may infer that the settlement included a confidentiality clause. Although we don't know this as a fact, we can also infer that no admission of liability was part of the agreement. How this works? They shrug and say, "we will pay these people some money, but it wasn't our fault?
Having settled the lawsuit, Toyota then asked a judge for the U.S. to drop all lawsuits over sudden acceleration declarations stating that they are based on anecdotes and could not identify any specific defects in vehicles.
Just a thought. If there were no specific defects on all these vehicles because Toyota fight so hard to prevent someone from the contents of the black box (crash recorder) and learning their history stored? Trade secrets? Cough ($ ^ & $) cough. Just a thought! The black box had a software that has been well reported.
If you were one of the hundreds of other consumers who have experienced the frightfulness of trying to stop a car out of control, and then have Toyota tell him that his experience was just a joke! An anecdote is defined as a short account of an interesting or humorous incident. Interesting or humorous!! Norman Taylor & Associates heard many consumers who have experienced sudden acceleration events with different degrees of scariness. Never once consumer experiences were considered anecdotes.
Thus continues the saga of Toyota. I keep waiting for them to man-up and do the right thing instead of grinding who still suggests that they may be missing for dirt cool.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar